[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231216222043.xxle6iugpbrwnhbe@moria.home.lan>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 17:20:43 -0500
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
keescook@...omium.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com, brauner@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 50/50] Kill sched.h dependency on rcupdate.h
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:35:04AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 10:35:51PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > by moving cond_resched_rcu() to rcupdate.h, we can kill another big
> > sched.h dependency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
>
> Could you please instead move the cond_resched_rcu() function to
> include/linux/rcupdate_wait.h? This would avoid breaking Ingo's
> separation that makes it possible to include rcupdate.h without also
> pulling in sched.h.
Yep, will do.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists