linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 46/50] preempt.h: Kill dependency on list.h

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231217001849.hmilfx63q44tv3vj@moria.home.lan>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 19:18:49 -0500
From: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, tj@...nel.org,
	peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
	paulmck@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
	longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, brauner@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 46/50] preempt.h: Kill dependency on list.h

On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 04:04:43PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/16/23 14:35, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 06:13:41AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 10:35:47PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> >>> -	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&notifier->link);
> >>> +	/* INIT_HLIST_NODE() open coded, to avoid dependency on list.h */
> >>> +	notifier->link.next = NULL;
> >>> +	notifier->link.pprev = NULL;
> >>
> >> Arguably INIT_HLIST_NODE() belongs in types.h -- we already have
> >> RCUREF_INIT() and ATOMIC_INIT() in there.
> > 
> > I think I'd prefer to keep types.h as minimal as possible - as soon as
> > we start putting non type stuff in there people won't know what the
> > distinction is and it'll grow.
> > 
> > preempt.h is a bit unusual too, normally we'd just split out a _types.h
> > header there but it's not so easy to split up usefully.
> > 
> 
> I don't feel like I have NAK power, but if I did, I would NAK
> open coding of INIT_HLIST_HEAD() or anything like it.
> I would expect some $maintainer to do likewise, but I could be
> surprised.

It's INIT_HLIST_HEAD(), there's approximately zero chance of the
implementation changing, and there's a comment.