linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: Add SSD133x OLED controllers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231217-hunk-cross-4bf51740957c@spud>
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2023 21:43:33 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@...il.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: display: Add SSD133x OLED controllers

On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 10:33:24PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> writes:
> 
> Hello Connor,
> 
> > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:07:03AM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> +properties:
> >> +  compatible:
> >> +    enum:
> >> +      - solomon,ssd1331
> >> +
> >> +required:
> >> +  - compatible
> >> +  - reg
> >> +
> >> +allOf:
> >> +  - $ref: solomon,ssd-common.yaml#
> >> +
> >> +  - if:
> >> +      properties:
> >> +        compatible:
> >> +          contains:
> >> +            const: solomon,ssd1331
> >> +    then:
> >> +      properties:
> >> +        width:
> >> +          default: 96
> >> +        height:
> >> +          default: 64
> >
> > Do you envisage a rake of devices that are going to end up in this
> > binding? Otherwise, why not unconditionally set the constraints?
> >
> 
> Because these are only for the default width and height, there can be
> panels using the same controller but that have a different resolution.
> 
> For example, there are panels using the SSD1306 controller that have
> 128x32 [0], 64x32 [1] or 128x64 [2] resolutions.

This, as you know, does not matter here.

> But answering your question, yes I think that more devices for this
> SSD133x family are going to be added later. Looking at [3], there is
> at least SSD1333 that has a different default resolutions (176x176).

That's fair enough though. I'd probably err on the side of introducing
this complexity when the other users actually show up though.

> 
> I think that even the SSD135x family could be supported by the same
> modsetting pipeline, but I need to get one to figure it out.
> 
> [0]: https://es.aliexpress.com/item/1005003648174074.html
> [1]: https://www.buydisplay.com/white-0-49-inch-oled-display-64x32-iic-i2c-ssd1306-connector-fpc
> [2]: https://es.aliexpress.com/item/1005001582340858.html?gatewayAdapt=glo2esp
> [3]: https://www.solomon-systech.com/product-search/?technology=oled-display
> 
> > Cheers,
> > Conor.
> 
> -- 
> Best regards,
> 
> Javier Martinez Canillas
> Core Platforms
> Red Hat
> 

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)