linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/2] kunit: Add example of kunit_activate_static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231218161044.215640-2-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:10:44 +0000
From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
To: <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>, <davidgow@...gle.com>, <rmoar@...gle.com>
CC: <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <patches@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
        "Richard
 Fitzgerald" <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] kunit: Add example of kunit_activate_static_stub() with pointer-to-function

Adds a variant of example_static_stub_test() that shows use of a
pointer-to-function with kunit_activate_static_stub().

A const pointer to the add_one() function is declared. This
pointer-to-function is passed to kunit_activate_static_stub() and
kunit_deactivate_static_stub() instead of passing add_one directly.

Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
---
 lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
index d2f7a3c62c18..9e57f341dc37 100644
--- a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
+++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
@@ -168,6 +168,8 @@ static int subtract_one(int i)
 	return i - 1;
 }
 
+static int (* const add_one_fn_ptr)(int i) = add_one;
+
 /*
  * This test shows the use of static stubs.
  */
@@ -187,6 +189,30 @@ static void example_static_stub_test(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
 }
 
+/*
+ * This test shows the use of static stubs when the function being
+ * replaced is provided as a pointer-to-function instead of the
+ * actual function. This is useful for providing access to static
+ * functions in a module by exporting a pointer to that function
+ * instead of having to change the static function to a non-static
+ * exported function.
+ */
+static void example_static_stub_using_fn_ptr_test(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* By default, function is not stubbed. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
+
+	/* Replace add_one() with subtract_one(). */
+	kunit_activate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr, subtract_one);
+
+	/* add_one() is now replaced. */
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 0);
+
+	/* Return add_one() to normal. */
+	kunit_deactivate_static_stub(test, add_one_fn_ptr);
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, add_one(1), 2);
+}
+
 static const struct example_param {
 	int value;
 } example_params_array[] = {
@@ -245,6 +271,7 @@ static struct kunit_case example_test_cases[] = {
 	KUNIT_CASE(example_mark_skipped_test),
 	KUNIT_CASE(example_all_expect_macros_test),
 	KUNIT_CASE(example_static_stub_test),
+	KUNIT_CASE(example_static_stub_using_fn_ptr_test),
 	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(example_params_test, example_gen_params),
 	KUNIT_CASE_SLOW(example_slow_test),
 	{}
-- 
2.30.2