lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 08:26:50 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: "Matyas, Daniel" <Daniel.Matyas@...log.com>
Cc: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 "linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org>,
 "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] hwmon: max31827: Add PEC support

On 12/18/23 06:55, Matyas, Daniel wrote:
[ ... ]
>> On top of that, it is not clear why regmap can't be used in the first place.
>> It seems that the major change is that one needs to read the configuration
>> register after a write to see if there was a PEC error. It is not immediately
>> obvious why that additional read (if indeed necessary) would require
>> regmap support to be dropped.
>>
> 
> I tried out writing and and reading with regmap, but it is not working properly. Even if I modify the client flag, I still receive only 2 bytes of data (a word). I should be receiving 2+1 bytes = data + CRC-8.
> 
> With i2c_smbus reads and writes, when I set the flag, I receive the 2+1 bytes, as expected.
> 

The SMBus code in drivers/i2c/i2c-core-smbus.c is supposed to check
if the received PEC is correct for SMBus transfers. Are you saying
that this doesn't work, or that regmap doesn't use SMBus functions
to communicate with the chip ?

Thanks,
Guenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ