[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYB0gyz-2M3k2kbD@alley>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 17:34:11 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Jim Cromie <jim.cromie@...il.com>
Cc: lb@...ihalf.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bleung@...gle.com, contact@...rsion.fr,
daniel@...ll.ch, dianders@...omium.org, groeck@...gle.com,
jbaron@...mai.com, john.ogness@...utronix.de, keescook@...omium.org,
ppaalanen@...il.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, seanpaul@...omium.org,
sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com, upstream@...ihalf.com,
vincent.whitchurch@...s.com, yanivt@...gle.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [re: PATCH v2 00/15 - 03/11] dyndbg: disambiguate quoting in a
debug msg
On Thu 2023-12-07 17:15:06, Jim Cromie wrote:
> When debugging a query parsing error, the debug message wraps the
> query in escaped-double-quotes. This is confusing when mixed with any
> quoted args where quotes are stripped by the shell.
>
> So this replaces the \"%s\" with <%s> in the format string, allowing a
> user to see how the shell strips quotes:
>
> lx]# echo module "foo" format ,_ -f > /proc/dynamic_debug/control
> [ 716.037430] dyndbg: read 26 bytes from userspace
> [ 716.037966] dyndbg: query 0: <module foo format ,_ -f> on module: <*>
Could you provide a real life example, please? It is hard to imagine
what '"foo" format' means in a real life.
Also could you please provide output before and after?
Honestly, Using <> as quotes looks pretty non-standard and confusing
to me. Also this changes only one place but '\"' is used in many
other locations which would make dyndbg messages even more confusing.
I do not understand how this would help. The double quote is gone
even in this variant.
BTW: It is a bit funny that this patch is supposed to make the debug
message better readable. For me, the echo command is hard
to read in the first place. I would use:
lx]# echo "module $my_module ,_ -f" > /proc/dynamic_debug/control
Maybe, this change fixes the output to match some personal style.
I wonder how common is the style. I can't remember seeing:
$> echo param param param
Instead I frequently see:
$> echo "bla bla bla".
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists