lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46bc7aa3-4b08-4e5f-9563-485ee17e2785@bytedance.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 14:34:23 +0800
From: Gang Li <ligang.bdlg@...edance.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
 Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: Gang Li <gang.li@...ux.dev>, David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
 Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] hugetlb: parallelize hugetlb page init on boot

Hi,

On 2023/12/13 08:10, David Rientjes wrote:
> On 6.6 I measured "hugepagesz=1G hugepages=11776" on as 12TB host to be
> 77s this time around.

Thanks for your test! Is this the total kernel boot time, or just the
hugetlb initialization time?

> 
> A latest Linus build with this patch set does not boot successfully, so

Which branch/tag is it compiled on?
I test this patch on v6.7-rc4 and next-20231130.

> I'll need to look into that and try to capture the failure.  Not sure if
> it's related to this patch or the latest Linus build in general.
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ