[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023121805-wrongness-whinny-8f41@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 07:54:10 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: bp@...en8.de, rafael@...nel.org, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
tanxiaofei@...wei.com, mawupeng1@...wei.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
linmiaohe@...wei.com, naoya.horiguchi@....com, james.morse@....com,
will@...nel.org, jarkko@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, justin.he@....com, ardb@...nel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, ashish.kalra@....com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, lenb@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
robert.moore@...el.com, lvying6@...wei.com, xiexiuqi@...wei.com,
zhuo.song@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/4] mm: memory-failure: move memory_failure() return
value documentation to function declaration
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 02:45:20PM +0800, Shuai Xue wrote:
> Part of return value comments for memory_failure() were originally
> documented at the call site. Move those comments to the function
> declaration to improve code readability and to provide developers with
> immediate access to function usage and return information.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuai Xue <xueshuai@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/core.c | 9 +--------
> mm/memory-failure.c | 9 ++++++---
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists