linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: sprd: Add support for Unisoc's UMS9620

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAfSe-uAczP0AmQFF3=LmfhtZZ45h-BS1BJrPkNu0MgZkSGLBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:37:41 +0800
From: Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, 
	Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>, Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: sprd: Add support for Unisoc's UMS9620

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 15:31, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 18/12/2023 08:18, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 15:00, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 18/12/2023 03:31, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 15 Dec 2023 at 18:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> >>> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 15/12/2023 09:56, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> >>>>> Add basic support for Unisoc's UMS9620, with this patch,
> >>>>> the board ums9620-2h10 can run into console.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ...
> >>>>
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +     soc: soc {
> >>>>
> >>>> Are you sure you do not have here W=1 warnings?
> >>>
> >>> Do you mean warnings generated by running "make W=1"? I tried just now
> >>> and didn't see warnings on this dts.
> >>
> >> No, I meant `dtbs_check W=1` or W=1 coming from dtc (dtbs).
> >
> > Yes, I just run "make W=1 dtbs",  also have tried `dtbs_check W=1`,
> > didn't see warnings on ums9620-2h10.dtb
>
> Ah, because it does not even compile!

The patch was generated from a middle commit (that was my mistake of course).

But I've fixed the issue. I ran the command just now according to your
comments, and didn't see the warnings on this dtb.

If I'm missing something, please correct me.

Thanks,
Chunyan