[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb16753d-ebec-4342-bed7-ee9a895c8547@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 09:41:07 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@...rfivetech.com>,
Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>,
Samin Guo <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>, Guenter Roeck
<linux@...ck-us.net>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] dt-bindings: watchdog: starfive,jh7100-wdt: Add
compatible for JH8100
On 16/12/2023 02:48, Ji Sheng Teoh wrote:
> Add "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible string for StarFive's JH8100
> watchdog.
> Since JH8100 watchdog only has 1 reset signal, update binding
> document to support one reset for "starfive,jh8100-wdt" compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <leyfoon.tan@...rfivetech.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ji Sheng Teoh <jisheng.teoh@...rfivetech.com>
> ---
> .../watchdog/starfive,jh7100-wdt.yaml | 29 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/starfive,jh7100-wdt.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/starfive,jh7100-wdt.yaml
> index 68f3f6fd08a6..ab077f64a83e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/starfive,jh7100-wdt.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/starfive,jh7100-wdt.yaml
> @@ -19,14 +19,12 @@ description:
> isn't cleared, the watchdog will reset the system unless the watchdog
> reset is disabled.
>
> -allOf:
> - - $ref: watchdog.yaml#
> -
> properties:
> compatible:
> enum:
> - starfive,jh7100-wdt
> - starfive,jh7110-wdt
> + - starfive,jh8100-wdt
What is happening with this patchset? I asked about one specific items.
you know - comment is written under specific inline quopte.
You wrote in changelog "Drop items in compatible field.", but I see
oneOf gone!
I have real doubts that you ever tested your entire solution with this
binding. Where is the DTS?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists