| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:13:47 +0100 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> To: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...cinc.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8550: remove address/size-cells from mdss_dsi1 On 18/12/2023 10:59, Tengfei Fan wrote: > > > 在 12/11/2023 6:25 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski 写道: >> On 07/12/2023 10:27, Tengfei Fan wrote: >>> Address/size-cells will cause dtbs check warning, because mdss_dsi1 node >>> have not ranges and child also have not reg, so remove address/size-cells. >> >> Paste the excerpt of warning. > Sure, I will paste the excerpt of warning. >> >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org> >>> Signed-off-by: Tengfei Fan <quic_tengfan@...cinc.com> >>> --- >> >> I am not sure if this is correct. The address/size cells are there for >> panels. We have multiple of such warnings, so I would like to have here >> consensus for all of them. > Currently these address/size cells lead to dtc W=1 warning, so these I know. > should be dropped. Why? They are correct. > These can be re-added if needed at a later date. Added where? These are rather properties of SoC. This does not solve any of my concerns. Best regards, Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists