[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023121820-deduce-treadmill-d44b@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:26:33 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Kyle Tso <kyletso@...gle.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the usb tree
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 04:48:12PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the devicetree tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.yaml
>
> between commits:
>
> 76cd718a9ffd ("dt-bindings: connector: usb: add accessory mode description")
> d1756ac67e7f ("dt-bindings: connector: usb: add altmodes description")
>
> from the usb tree and commit:
>
> 0d3a771610d0 ("dt-bindings: connector: Add child nodes for multiple PD capabilities")
>
> from the devicetree tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Looks good to me, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists