[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5ae9ba1f-07b9-423e-bf74-175e57dda031@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:38:33 +0530
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, X86-kernel <x86@...nel.org>
CC: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <tj@...nel.org>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, <paulmck@...nel.org>,
<keescook@...omium.org>, <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<will@...nel.org>, <longman@...hat.com>, <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
<brauner@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/50] x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c: fix missing include
For the x86 patches [2-5/50], should the patch subject be a bit more
generic rather than having the full file name listed.
For example, this patch could be "x86/fpu: Fix missing include".
On 12/16/2023 8:17 AM, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/bugs.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists