| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <44cb77d0-1d9a-47af-b699-e3019b520574@arm.com> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:56:50 +0000 From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> To: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com, amit.kucheria@...durent.com, amit.kachhap@...il.com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, mhiramat@...nel.org, wvw@...gle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 22/23] PM: EM: Add em_dev_compute_costs() as API for device drivers Hi Dietmar and Qais, On 12/17/23 18:03, Qais Yousef wrote: > On 12/12/23 19:50, Dietmar Eggemann wrote: >> On 29/11/2023 12:08, Lukasz Luba wrote: >>> The device drivers can modify EM at runtime by providing a new EM table. >>> The EM is used by the EAS and the em_perf_state::cost stores >>> pre-calculated value to avoid overhead. This patch provides the API for >>> device drivers to calculate the cost values properly (and not duplicate >>> the same code). >> >> New interface w/o any users? Can we not remove this from this patch-set >> and introduce it with the first user(s)? I didn't wanted to introduce the user of this in the same patch set. I will send a follow up patch for Exynos SoC. More about this below. > > It's a chicken and egg problem. No interface, will not enable the new users to > appear too. So assuming the interface makes sense, I vote to keep it. There are already in mainline platforms which will benefit from this feature and would use this API. The platform which support chip binning and adjust the voltage based on that information. It can be a driver which can even be built as a module. One example is Exynos5 ASV (Adaptive Supply Voltage) part of the Exynos chipid driver [1]. Here is the dmesg log with some additional debug from this driver. As you can see the EM finished the registration and also update (the new feature from this patch set), but it worked on old Voltages from OPPs. (Also, this driver can be built as a module). ------------------------------------------------- [ 4.651049] cpu cpu4: EM: created perf domain [ 4.654073] cpu cpu0: EM: OPP:1200000 is inefficient [ 4.654108] cpu cpu0: EM: OPP:1100000 is inefficient [ 4.654140] cpu cpu0: EM: OPP:900000 is inefficient [ 4.654173] cpu cpu0: EM: OPP:800000 is inefficient [ 4.654204] cpu cpu0: EM: OPP:600000 is inefficient [ 4.654235] cpu cpu0: EM: OPP:500000 is inefficient [ 4.654266] cpu cpu0: EM: OPP:400000 is inefficient [ 4.654297] cpu cpu0: EM: OPP:200000 is inefficient [ 4.654342] cpu cpu0: EM: updated .... [ 4.750026] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: cpu0 opp0, freq: 1500 missing [ 4.755329] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1175000 opp_volt=1275000 [ 4.763213] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1125000 opp_volt=1250000 [ 4.770982] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1075000 opp_volt=1250000 [ 4.778820] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1037500 opp_volt=1250000 [ 4.786515] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1000000 opp_volt=1100000 [ 4.794356] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=962500 opp_volt=1100000 [ 4.802018] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=925000 opp_volt=1100000 [ 4.816323] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=1000000 [ 4.824109] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=1000000 [ 4.839933] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=1000000 [ 4.854762] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=1000000 [ 4.866191] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=900000 [ 4.878812] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=900000 [ 4.886052] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: cpu4 opp0, freq: 2100 missing [ 4.892800] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1225000 opp_volt=1312500 [ 4.900542] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1162500 opp_volt=1262500 [ 4.908342] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1112500 opp_volt=1237500 [ 4.916066] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1075000 opp_volt=1250000 [ 4.923926] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1037500 opp_volt=1250000 [ 4.931707] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=1000000 opp_volt=1100000 [ 4.939582] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=975000 opp_volt=1100000 [ 4.947225] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=950000 opp_volt=1100000 [ 4.954885] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=925000 opp_volt=1000000 [ 4.962601] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=1000000 [ 4.974047] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=1000000 [ 4.974071] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=1000000 [ 4.993670] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=900000 [ 5.001163] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=900000 [ 5.008818] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=900000 [ 5.016318] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=900000 [ 5.023955] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=900000 [ 5.039723] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=900000 [ 5.054445] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Checking asv_volt=900000 opp_volt=900000 [ 5.066709] exynos-chipid 10000000.chipid: Exynos: CPU[EXYNOS5800] PRO_ID[0xe5422000] REV[0x1] Detected ------------------------------------------------- The new EM which would be updated from that driver, would have lower voltages as well as different 'inefficient OPPs'. The maximum voltage difference based on the tables is 13.54% which means for the dynamic power: 1362500 = 1.135416667 * 1200000 P_dyn = C* f * (V*1.1354 * V*1.1354) = C*f*V^2 * 1.289 That's ~29% different dynamic power (for one core). This Voltage adjustment is due to chip lottery. Different SoC vendors use different name for this fact. I only have this Exynos platform, but when this API and v5 features get in, the vendors can modify their drivers and test. This should help both: EAS and IPA/DTPM. Regards, Lukasz [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos5422-asv.c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists