linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 5/8] jbd2: fix soft lockup in journal_finish_inode_data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231218124635.1381482-5-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 07:46:26 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
	Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	jack@...e.com,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.10 5/8] jbd2: fix soft lockup in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers()

From: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>

[ Upstream commit 6c02757c936063f0631b4e43fe156f8c8f1f351f ]

There's issue when do io test:
WARN: soft lockup - CPU#45 stuck for 11s! [jbd2/dm-2-8:4170]
CPU: 45 PID: 4170 Comm: jbd2/dm-2-8 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G  OE
Call trace:
 dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0
 show_stack+0x24/0x30
 dump_stack+0xb0/0x100
 watchdog_timer_fn+0x254/0x3f8
 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x11c/0x380
 hrtimer_interrupt+0xfc/0x2f8
 arch_timer_handler_phys+0x38/0x58
 handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x248
 generic_handle_irq+0x3c/0x58
 __handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
 gic_handle_irq+0x90/0x320
 el1_irq+0xcc/0x180
 queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x1d8/0x320
 jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x10f4/0x1c78 [jbd2]
 kjournald2+0xec/0x2f0 [jbd2]
 kthread+0x134/0x138
 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18

Analyzed informations from vmcore as follows:
(1) There are about 5k+ jbd2_inode in 'commit_transaction->t_inode_list';
(2) Now is processing the 855th jbd2_inode;
(3) JBD2 task has TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag;
(4) There's no pags in address_space around the 855th jbd2_inode;
(5) There are some process is doing drop caches;
(6) Mounted with 'nodioread_nolock' option;
(7) 128 CPUs;

According to informations from vmcore we know 'journal->j_list_lock' spin lock
competition is fierce. So journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() maybe process
slowly. Theoretically, there is scheduling point in the filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors().
However, if inode's address_space has no pages which taged with PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK,
will not call cond_resched(). So may lead to soft lockup.
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers
  filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors
    __filemap_fdatawait_range
      while (index <= end)
        nr_pages = pagevec_lookup_range_tag(&pvec, mapping, &index, end, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK);
        if (!nr_pages)
           break;    --> If 'nr_pages' is equal zero will break, then will not call cond_resched()
        for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
          wait_on_page_writeback(page);
        cond_resched();

To solve above issue, add scheduling point in the journal_finish_inode_data_buffers();

Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211112544.3879780-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/jbd2/commit.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
index fa24b407a9dcb..db137671a41f1 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c
@@ -300,6 +300,7 @@ static int journal_finish_inode_data_buffers(journal_t *journal,
 			if (!ret)
 				ret = err;
 		}
+		cond_resched();
 		spin_lock(&journal->j_list_lock);
 		jinode->i_flags &= ~JI_COMMIT_RUNNING;
 		smp_mb();
-- 
2.43.0