[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <997f2a94-66d9-fb95-8f75-46d61937f7e8@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 18:35:13 +0530
From: Sanath S <sanaths2@....com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sanath S <Sanath.S@....com>, mario.limonciello@....com,
andreas.noever@...il.com, michael.jamet@...el.com, YehezkelShB@...il.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2 2/2] thunderbolt: Teardown tunnels and reset downstream
ports created by boot firmware
On 12/18/2023 5:53 PM, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 01:31:51PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 04:49:13PM +0530, Sanath S wrote:
>>>> The discover part should not do anything (like write the hardware) so
>>>> perhaps it is just some timing thing (but that's weird too).
>>>>
>>>> I think we should do something like this:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Disable all enabled protocol adapters (reset them to defaults).
>>>> 2. Clear all protocol adapter paths.
>>>> 3. Issue DPR over all enabled USB4 ports.
>>>>
>>>> BTW, what you mean "didn't work"?
>>> Path activation would go fine after DPR like below:
>>>
>>> [ 15.090905] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: 0:5 <-> 2:9 (PCI): activating
>>> [ 15.090932] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: activating PCIe Down path from 0:5
>>> to 2:9
>>> [ 15.091602] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: activating PCIe Up path from 2:9 to
>>> 0:5
>>>
>>> But, PCIE enumeration doesn't happen (pcie link up will not happen, will not
>>> see below logs)
>>> [ 15.134223] pcieport 0000:00:03.1: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Card present
>>> [ 15.134243] pcieport 0000:00:03.1: pciehp: Slot(0-1): Link Up
>> Okay, what if you like reset the PCIe adapter config spaces back to the
>> defaults? Just as an experiment.
> If this turns out to be really complex then I guess it is better to do
> it like you did originally using discovery but at least it would be nice
> to see what the end result of this experiment looks like :)
Yes, I'll give a try.
As an experiment, I tried to compare the path deactivation that occurs
at two place.
1. In tb_switch_reset where we are calling tb_path_deactivate_hop(port, i).
2. While we get a unplug event after doing DPR.
I observed both have different hop_index and port numbers.
So, are we calling tb_path_deactivate_hop with wrong hop ids ?
From deactivate tunnel (called while unplug) :
[ 3.408268] thunderbolt 0000:c4:00.5: deactivating PCIe Down path
from 2:9 to 0:5
[ 3.408282] deactivate hop port = 9 hop_index=8
[ 3.408328] deactivate hop port = 2 hop_index=10
Deactivate from tb_switch_reset() :
deactivate hop port = 5 hop_index=8
Powered by blists - more mailing lists