[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <88cf7dcf-ec74-4176-9273-dbbc49dea271@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 11:29:48 +0800
From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: shr@...kernel.io, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: fix arithmetic for bdi min_ratio and max_ratio
+cc fsdevel
On 12/18/23 11:16 AM, Jingbo Xu wrote:
> bdi->[min|max]_ratio are both part per million. Fix the wrong
> arithmetic when setting bdi's min_ratio and max_ratio.
>
> Fixes: efc3e6ad53ea ("mm: split off __bdi_set_max_ratio() function")
> Fixes: 8021fb3232f2 ("mm: split off __bdi_set_min_ratio() function")
> Reported-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> mm/page-writeback.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
> index ee2fd6a6af40..b393b3281ce9 100644
> --- a/mm/page-writeback.c
> +++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
> @@ -692,7 +692,6 @@ static int __bdi_set_min_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int min_ra
>
> if (min_ratio > 100 * BDI_RATIO_SCALE)
> return -EINVAL;
> - min_ratio *= BDI_RATIO_SCALE;
>
> spin_lock_bh(&bdi_lock);
> if (min_ratio > bdi->max_ratio) {
> @@ -729,7 +728,8 @@ static int __bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int max_ra
> ret = -EINVAL;
> } else {
> bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio;
> - bdi->max_prop_frac = (FPROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100;
> + bdi->max_prop_frac = div64_u64(FPROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio,
> + 100UL * BDI_RATIO_SCALE);
> }
> spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
>
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists