linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/14] hfsplus: Really remove hfsplus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:04:01 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] hfsplus: Really remove hfsplus_writepage

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:41:27AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > although I had some reason to be careful back then.  hfsplus should
> > be testable again that the hfsplus Linux port is back alive.  Is there
> > any volunteer to test hfsplus on the fsdevel list?
> 
> What do you have in mind on that side? "Just" running it through fstests 
> and see that we don't regress here or more than that?

Yeah.  Back in the day I ran hfsplus through xfstests, IIRC that might
even have been the initial motivation for supporting file systems
that don't support sparse files.  I bet a lot has regressed or isn't
support since, though.