[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231218150401.GA19279@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:04:01 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/14] hfsplus: Really remove hfsplus_writepage
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:41:27AM +0000, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > although I had some reason to be careful back then. hfsplus should
> > be testable again that the hfsplus Linux port is back alive. Is there
> > any volunteer to test hfsplus on the fsdevel list?
>
> What do you have in mind on that side? "Just" running it through fstests
> and see that we don't regress here or more than that?
Yeah. Back in the day I ran hfsplus through xfstests, IIRC that might
even have been the initial motivation for supporting file systems
that don't support sparse files. I bet a lot has regressed or isn't
support since, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists