linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] dts: iot2050: Support IOT2050-SM variant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cc6b7f99-3439-45a1-b4b4-0b5796dcbbbf@siemens.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:48:18 +0100
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
 Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
 Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Bao Cheng Su <baocheng.su@...mens.com>,
 Chao Zeng <chao.zeng@...mens.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Li Hua Qian <huaqian.li@...mens.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] dts: iot2050: Support IOT2050-SM variant

On 19.12.23 16:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/12/2023 16:40, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 19.12.23 16:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 19/12/2023 16:37, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You have label for that... Somehow all these nodes are half-baked,
>>>>>>> without all the expected properties and now you call node name as ABI.
>>>>>>> The node name is not the ABI.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, existing userspace uses those names, and adding the properties
>>>>>> would break that interface. Now, does Linux do that?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think you understood the concept. There is no change for
>>>>> userspace. Same interface, same names. No ABI break.
>>>>
>>>> I do understand the impact very well:
>>>> open("/sys/class/leds/user-led1-red") has to work for all the variants,
>>>> consistently and backward-compatible for userspace.
>>>
>>> And it will. The name is the same.
>>
>> Nope, it's not - I tried that already :)
>>
>> root@...2050-debian:~# ls -l /sys/class/leds/
>> total 0
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Dec 19 09:49 green:indicator -> ../../devices/platform/leds/leds/green:indicator
> 
> And how does your DTS look like?
> 
> Because I also tried and it is exactly the same.
> 

I played with

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi
index 402afa4bc1b6..a791444eeb93 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am65-iot2050-common.dtsi
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  */
 
 #include "k3-am654.dtsi"
+#include <dt-bindings/leds/common.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/phy/phy.h>
 #include <dt-bindings/net/ti-dp83867.h>
 
@@ -84,27 +85,39 @@ leds {
 		pinctrl-0 = <&leds_pins_default>;
 
 		status-led-red {
+			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
+			function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
 			gpios = <&wkup_gpio0 32 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
 			panic-indicator;
 		};
 
 		status-led-green {
+			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
+			function = LED_FUNCTION_STATUS;
 			gpios = <&wkup_gpio0 24 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
 		};
 
 		user-led1-red {
+			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
+			function = LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR;
 			gpios = <&pcal9535_3 14 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
 		};
 
 		user-led1-green {
+			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_GREEN>;
+			function = LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR;
 			gpios = <&pcal9535_2 15 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
 		};
 
 		user-led2-red {
+			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
+			function = LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR;
 			gpios = <&wkup_gpio0 17 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
 		};
 
 		user-led2-green {
+			color = <LED_COLOR_ID_RED>;
+			function = LED_FUNCTION_INDICATOR;
 			gpios = <&wkup_gpio0 22 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
 		};
 	};

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Technology
Linux Expert Center