[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231219024246.65654-3-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:42:46 +0800
From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: shr@...kernel.io,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joseph.qi@...ux.alibaba.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] mm: fix arithmetic for max_prop_frac when setting max_ratio
Since now bdi->max_ratio is part per million, fix the wrong arithmetic
for max_prop_frac when setting max_ratio. Otherwise the miscalculated
max_prop_frac will affect the incrementing of writeout completion count
when max_ratio is not 100%.
Fixes: efc3e6ad53ea ("mm: split off __bdi_set_max_ratio() function")
Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/page-writeback.c b/mm/page-writeback.c
index 2140382dd768..dda59b368c01 100644
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ b/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -728,7 +728,8 @@ static int __bdi_set_max_ratio(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, unsigned int max_ra
ret = -EINVAL;
} else {
bdi->max_ratio = max_ratio;
- bdi->max_prop_frac = (FPROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio) / 100;
+ bdi->max_prop_frac = div64_u64(FPROP_FRAC_BASE * max_ratio,
+ 100 * BDI_RATIO_SCALE);
}
spin_unlock_bh(&bdi_lock);
--
2.19.1.6.gb485710b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists