linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Remove unnecessary goto statement from ufs_qcom_config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 19:05:56 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Chanwoo Lee <cw9316.lee@...sung.com>, mani@...nel.org, agross@...nel.org,
 andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
 martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: grant.jung@...sung.com, jt77.jang@...sung.com, dh0421.hwang@...sung.com,
 sh043.lee@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: qcom: Remove unnecessary goto statement from
 ufs_qcom_config_esi function

Le 19/12/2023 à 09:27, Chanwoo Lee a écrit :
> From: ChanWoo Lee <cw9316.lee@...sung.com>
> 
> There is only one place where goto is used,
> and it is unnecessary to check the ret value through 'goto out'
> because the ret value is already true.
> 
> Therefore, remove the goto statement and
> integrate the '!ret' condition into the existing code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: ChanWoo Lee <cw9316.lee@...sung.com>

Reviewed-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>

> ---
>   drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c | 7 ++-----
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index 17e24270477d..8cf803806326 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -1929,7 +1929,7 @@ static int ufs_qcom_config_esi(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   					     ufs_qcom_write_msi_msg);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to request Platform MSI %d\n", ret);
> -		goto out;
> +		return ret;
>   	}
>   
>   	msi_lock_descs(hba->dev);
> @@ -1964,11 +1964,8 @@ static int ufs_qcom_config_esi(struct ufs_hba *hba)
>   				      REG_UFS_CFG3);
>   		}
>   		ufshcd_mcq_enable_esi(hba);
> -	}
> -
> -out:
> -	if (!ret)
>   		host->esi_enabled = true;
> +	}
>   
>   	return ret;
>   }