[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYIesYOHfpEi4QCr@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:52:33 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org,
tj@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com,
paulmck@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org,
longman@...hat.com, boqun.feng@...il.com, brauner@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/50] kernel/numa.c: Move logging out of numa.h
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 10:26:14PM -0500, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/numa.c b/kernel/numa.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..c24c72f45989
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/numa.c
Should this be a new file or would these functions fit better in, eg,
mempolicy.c which is already built only if CONFIG_NUMA?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists