[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65822909ebe4c_269bd294f5@dwillia2-mobl3.amr.corp.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 15:36:42 -0800
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jonathan Cameron
<Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Smita Koralahalli
<Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>, Shiju Jose <shiju.jose@...wei.com>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, "Ard
Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas
<bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] cxl/memdev: Register for and process CPER events
Ira Weiny wrote:
[..]
> > and drop the = NULL above.
>
> Done.
The NULL assignment was more about making it clear that
__free(pci_dev_put) will take no action until the pdev is acquired.
Otherwise, any future refactoring that introduces a 'return' before
@pdev is acquired needs to be careful to assign @pdev to NULL. So, just
include it in the declaration more as a __free() declaration style issue
than a correctness issue.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists