linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3 3/6] irqchip: Introduce RTD1319 support using the Realtek common interrupt controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 05:51:06 +0000
From: James Tai [戴志峰] <james.tai@...ltek.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        "Rob
 Herring" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski
	<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel test robot
	<lkp@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 3/6] irqchip: Introduce RTD1319 support using the Realtek common interrupt controller driver

Hi Thomas,

>On Wed, Nov 29 2023 at 13:43, James Tai wrote:
>> Add support for the RTD1319 platform.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>> Closes:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311061208.hJmxGqym-lkp@intel.
>> com/
>
>Again: These tags are just wrong.

I will remove it.

>> +static struct platform_driver realtek_intc_rtd1319_driver = {
>> +     .probe = rtd1319_intc_probe,
>> +     .driver = {
>> +             .name = "realtek_intc_rtd1319",
>> +             .of_match_table = realtek_intc_rtd1319_dt_matches,
>> +             .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
>> +             .pm = &realtek_intc_rtd1319_pm_ops,
>> +     },
>
>        .probe  = rtd1319_intc_probe,
>        .driver = {
>                .name                   = "realtek_intc_rtd1319",
>                .of_match_table         =
>realtek_intc_rtd1319_dt_matches,
>                ....
>
>Please.
>
I will fix it.

>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init realtek_intc_rtd1319_init(void) {
>> +     return platform_driver_register(&realtek_intc_rtd1319_driver);
>> +}
>> +core_initcall(realtek_intc_rtd1319_init);
>
>What? This can be built as a module. So how is core_initcall() in any way correct
>here? module_init() perhaps?
>
I want the driver to be buildable as a module. Based on my test, the 'core_initcall()' works.
But, I will use 'module_init()' instead.

Thanks for your feedback.

Regards,
James