linux-kernel - [PATCH wireless-next 08/11] wifi: rtlwifi: rtl8192ee: using calculate_bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231219065739.1895666-9-suhui@nfschina.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:57:36 +0800
From: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To: pkshih@...ltek.com,
	kvalo@...nel.org
Cc: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>,
	Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
	linville@...driver.com,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH wireless-next 08/11] wifi: rtlwifi: rtl8192ee: using calculate_bit_shift()

Using calculate_bit_shift() to replace _rtl92ee_phy_calculate_bit_shift().
And fix the undefined bitwise shift behavior problem.

Fixes: b1a3bfc97cd9 ("rtlwifi: rtl8192ee: Move driver from staging to the regular tree")
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
---
 .../net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ee/phy.c | 16 ++++------------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ee/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ee/phy.c
index cc0bcaf13e96..73ef602bfb01 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ee/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ee/phy.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ static u32 _rtl92ee_phy_rf_serial_read(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 static void _rtl92ee_phy_rf_serial_write(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 					 enum radio_path rfpath, u32 offset,
 					 u32 data);
-static u32 _rtl92ee_phy_calculate_bit_shift(u32 bitmask);
 static bool _rtl92ee_phy_bb8192ee_config_parafile(struct ieee80211_hw *hw);
 static bool _rtl92ee_phy_config_mac_with_headerfile(struct ieee80211_hw *hw);
 static bool phy_config_bb_with_hdr_file(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
@@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ u32 rtl92ee_phy_query_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr, u32 bitmask)
 	rtl_dbg(rtlpriv, COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE,
 		"regaddr(%#x), bitmask(%#x)\n", regaddr, bitmask);
 	originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr);
-	bitshift = _rtl92ee_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+	bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 	returnvalue = (originalvalue & bitmask) >> bitshift;
 
 	rtl_dbg(rtlpriv, COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE,
@@ -68,7 +67,7 @@ void rtl92ee_phy_set_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr,
 
 	if (bitmask != MASKDWORD) {
 		originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr);
-		bitshift = _rtl92ee_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+		bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 		data = ((originalvalue & (~bitmask)) | (data << bitshift));
 	}
 
@@ -92,7 +91,7 @@ u32 rtl92ee_phy_query_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 	spin_lock(&rtlpriv->locks.rf_lock);
 
 	original_value = _rtl92ee_phy_rf_serial_read(hw , rfpath, regaddr);
-	bitshift = _rtl92ee_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+	bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 	readback_value = (original_value & bitmask) >> bitshift;
 
 	spin_unlock(&rtlpriv->locks.rf_lock);
@@ -119,7 +118,7 @@ void rtl92ee_phy_set_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 
 	if (bitmask != RFREG_OFFSET_MASK) {
 		original_value = _rtl92ee_phy_rf_serial_read(hw, rfpath, addr);
-		bitshift = _rtl92ee_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+		bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 		data = (original_value & (~bitmask)) | (data << bitshift);
 	}
 
@@ -201,13 +200,6 @@ static void _rtl92ee_phy_rf_serial_write(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 		pphyreg->rf3wire_offset, data_and_addr);
 }
 
-static u32 _rtl92ee_phy_calculate_bit_shift(u32 bitmask)
-{
-	u32 i = ffs(bitmask);
-
-	return i ? i - 1 : 32;
-}
-
 bool rtl92ee_phy_mac_config(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 {
 	return _rtl92ee_phy_config_mac_with_headerfile(hw);
-- 
2.30.2