linux-kernel - [PATCH wireless-next 09/11] wifi: rtlwifi: rtl8192se: using calculate_bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231219065739.1895666-10-suhui@nfschina.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:57:37 +0800
From: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To: pkshih@...ltek.com,
	kvalo@...nel.org
Cc: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>,
	chaoming_li@...lsil.com.cn,
	linville@...driver.com,
	Larry.Finger@...inger.net,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH wireless-next 09/11] wifi: rtlwifi: rtl8192se: using calculate_bit_shift()

Using calculate_bit_shift() to replace _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift().
And fix the undefined bitwise shift behavior problem.

Fixes: d15853163bea ("rtlwifi: rtl8192se: Merge phy routines")
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
---
 .../net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c  | 15 ++++-----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c
index 09591a0b5a81..d9ef7e1da1db 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192se/phy.c
@@ -14,13 +14,6 @@
 #include "hw.h"
 #include "table.h"
 
-static u32 _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(u32 bitmask)
-{
-	u32 i = ffs(bitmask);
-
-	return i ? i - 1 : 32;
-}
-
 u32 rtl92s_phy_query_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr, u32 bitmask)
 {
 	struct rtl_priv *rtlpriv = rtl_priv(hw);
@@ -30,7 +23,7 @@ u32 rtl92s_phy_query_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr, u32 bitmask)
 		regaddr, bitmask);
 
 	originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr);
-	bitshift = _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+	bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 	returnvalue = (originalvalue & bitmask) >> bitshift;
 
 	rtl_dbg(rtlpriv, COMP_RF, DBG_TRACE, "BBR MASK=0x%x Addr[0x%x]=0x%x\n",
@@ -52,7 +45,7 @@ void rtl92s_phy_set_bb_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, u32 regaddr, u32 bitmask,
 
 	if (bitmask != MASKDWORD) {
 		originalvalue = rtl_read_dword(rtlpriv, regaddr);
-		bitshift = _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+		bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 		data = ((originalvalue & (~bitmask)) | (data << bitshift));
 	}
 
@@ -157,7 +150,7 @@ u32 rtl92s_phy_query_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum radio_path rfpath,
 
 	original_value = _rtl92s_phy_rf_serial_read(hw, rfpath, regaddr);
 
-	bitshift = _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+	bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 	readback_value = (original_value & bitmask) >> bitshift;
 
 	spin_unlock(&rtlpriv->locks.rf_lock);
@@ -188,7 +181,7 @@ void rtl92s_phy_set_rf_reg(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, enum radio_path rfpath,
 	if (bitmask != RFREG_OFFSET_MASK) {
 		original_value = _rtl92s_phy_rf_serial_read(hw, rfpath,
 							    regaddr);
-		bitshift = _rtl92s_phy_calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
+		bitshift = calculate_bit_shift(bitmask);
 		data = ((original_value & (~bitmask)) | (data << bitshift));
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.2