linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] leds: qcom-lpg: Add PM660L configuration and compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3lsapoxlqijes5m4nqcbhdfhhs4chq3mcq3jaty7v2zihsqnwu@nn67a4h6425k>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 10:17:16 +0100
From: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, 
	~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, 
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>, 
	Martin Botka <martin.botka@...ainline.org>, Jami Kettunen <jami.kettunen@...ainline.org>, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] leds: qcom-lpg: Add PM660L configuration and
 compatible

Hi Johan and Lee,

On 2023-12-19 09:22:43, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Hi Marijn and Lee,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 11:18:48PM +0200, Marijn Suijten wrote:
> > Inherit PM660L PMIC LPG/triled block configuration from downstream
> > drivers and DT sources, consisting of a triled block with automatic
> > trickle charge control and source selection, three colored led channels
> > belonging to the synchronized triled block and one loose PWM channel.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes since v3:
> > - Rebased on -next;
> > - (series) dropped DTS patches that have been applied through the
> >   Qualcomm DTS tree, leaving only leds changes (driver and
> >   accompanying dt-bindings).
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
> > index 02f51cc61837..102ab0c33887 100644
> > --- a/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
> > +++ b/drivers/leds/rgb/leds-qcom-lpg.c
> > @@ -1304,6 +1304,23 @@ static int lpg_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static const struct lpg_data pm660l_lpg_data = {
> > +	.lut_base = 0xb000,
> > +	.lut_size = 49,
> > +
> > +	.triled_base = 0xd000,
> > +	.triled_has_atc_ctl = true,
> > +	.triled_has_src_sel = true,
> > +
> > +	.num_channels = 4,
> > +	.channels = (const struct lpg_channel_data[]) {
> > +		{ .base = 0xb100, .triled_mask = BIT(5) },
> > +		{ .base = 0xb200, .triled_mask = BIT(6) },
> > +		{ .base = 0xb300, .triled_mask = BIT(7) },
> > +		{ .base = 0xb400 },
> > +	},
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct lpg_data pm8916_pwm_data = {
> >  	.num_channels = 1,
> >  	.channels = (const struct lpg_channel_data[]) {
> > @@ -1424,6 +1441,7 @@ static const struct lpg_data pm8350c_pwm_data = {
> >  };
> >  
> >  static const struct of_device_id lpg_of_table[] = {
> > +	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-lpg", .data = &pm660l_lpg_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8150b-lpg", .data = &pm8150b_lpg_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-lpg", .data = &pm8150l_lpg_data },
> >  	{ .compatible = "qcom,pm8350c-pwm", .data = &pm8350c_pwm_data },
> 
> When reviewing the Qualcomm SPMI PMIC bindings I noticed that this patch
> was never picked up by the LEDs maintainer, while the binding and dtsi
> changes made it in:
> 
> 	https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220719211848.1653920-2-marijn.suijten@somainline.org
> 
> Looks like it may still apply cleanly, but otherwise, would you mind
> rebasing and resending so that Lee can pick this one up?
> 
> Johan

Coincidentally I haven't touched this device/platform for months... until last
weekend where I noticed the same.  It does not apply cleanly and I had to solve
some conflicts:

https://github.com/SoMainline/linux/commit/8ec5d02eaffcec24fcab6a989ab117a5b72b96b6

I'll gladly resend this!

Note that I have one more unmerged leds patch around, that hasn't been looked
at either.  Would it help to send this once again, perhaps with more reviewers/
testing (Johan, would you mind taking a look too)?

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20220719213034.1664056-1-marijn.suijten@somainline.org/

Thanks!

- Marijn