[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYFunIR3WTWEQZ27@shikoro>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:21:16 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-fsd@...la.com,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: i2c: exynos5: add specific compatible
for Tesla FSD
On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 10:22:24AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Tesla FSD is a derivative of Samsung Exynos SoC, thus just like the
> others it reuses several devices from older designs. Historically we
> kept the old (block's) compatible only. This works fine and there is no
> bug here, however guidelines expressed in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.rst state that:
> 1. Compatibles should be specific.
> 2. We should add new compatibles in case of bugs or features.
>
> Add Tesla FSD compatible specific to be used with an existing fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists