lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 20:35:09 +0800
From: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To: Junwen Wu <wudaemon@....com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, 
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, 
	bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] sched/rt: Fix rt task's sched latency statistics in
 sched_stat_wait trace_point

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:05 PM Junwen Wu <wudaemon@....com> wrote:
>
> When enable sched_stat_wait trace_point, some rt tasks sched latency
> so long, like this:
> sched_stat_wait: comm=rcu_preempt pid=14 delay=4936139545261 [ns]
> Rt task has low latency, it must have a bug. I found the reason is
> When rt task balance off source cpu, dequeue operation not update
> the sched_statistics, so follow update_stats_wait_end_fair
> update method.

Thanks for your report!

>
> Signed-off-by: Junwen Wu <wudaemon@....com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/rt.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index 6aaf0a3d6081..c75215947c20 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -1360,12 +1360,15 @@ update_stats_dequeue_rt(struct rt_rq *rt_rq, struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se,
>                         int flags)
>  {
>         struct task_struct *p = NULL;
> +       struct rq *rq = rq_of_rt_se(rt_se);
>
>         if (!schedstat_enabled())
>                 return;
>
>         if (rt_entity_is_task(rt_se))
>                 p = rt_task_of(rt_se);
> +       if (p != rq->curr)

This seems wrong, the rt_se might not be a task.

I think we'd better use if (!on_rt_rq(rt_se))

> +               update_stats_wait_end_rt(rt_rq, rt_se);
>
>         if ((flags & DEQUEUE_SLEEP) && p) {
>                 unsigned int state;
> --
> 2.34.1
>


--
Regards
Yafang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ