[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZYMNSqFgAhId-lQ2@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:50:34 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
kubakici@...pl, phil@...pberrypi.org, bo.svangard@...eddedart.se,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/18] serial: sc16is7xx: add macro for max number of
UART ports
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 12:18:53PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
>
> Add macro to hold the maximum number of UART ports per IC/device.
...
> - if (count < 0 || count > ARRAY_SIZE(irda_port))
> + if (count < 0 || count > SC16IS7XX_MAX_PORTS)
ARRAY_SIZE() is more robust than this. What if you change to support different
devices where this won't be as defined?
> return;
...
> - if (count < 0 || count > ARRAY_SIZE(mctrl_port))
> + if (count < 0 || count > SC16IS7XX_MAX_PORTS)
> return 0;
Ditto.
...
> + WARN_ON(devtype->nr_uart > SC16IS7XX_MAX_PORTS);
Not sure about this, perhaps it's fine.
Otherwise looks reasonable.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists