[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <170308795185.398.6524480484626871187.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 15:59:11 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Anna-Maria Behnsen" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Anna-Maria Behnsen" <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] tick/sched: Cleanup confusing variables
The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 318050671affa92fd166d988d08d4041c7b113c4
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/318050671affa92fd166d988d08d4041c7b113c4
Author: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Fri, 01 Dec 2023 10:26:24 +01:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:49:37 +01:00
tick/sched: Cleanup confusing variables
tick_nohz_stop_tick() contains the expires (u64 variable) and tick
(ktime_t) variable. In the beginning the value of expires is written to
tick. Afterwards none of the variables is changed. They are only used for
checks.
Drop the not required variable tick and use always expires instead.
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231201092654.34614-3-anna-maria@linutronix.de
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index ff25fdf..fce3c6f 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -887,7 +887,6 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
struct clock_event_device *dev = __this_cpu_read(tick_cpu_device.evtdev);
u64 basemono = ts->timer_expires_base;
u64 expires = ts->timer_expires;
- ktime_t tick = expires;
/* Make sure we won't be trying to stop it twice in a row. */
ts->timer_expires_base = 0;
@@ -910,7 +909,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
/* Skip reprogram of event if it's not changed */
if (ts->tick_stopped && (expires == ts->next_tick)) {
/* Sanity check: make sure clockevent is actually programmed */
- if (tick == KTIME_MAX || ts->next_tick == hrtimer_get_expires(&ts->sched_timer))
+ if (expires == KTIME_MAX || ts->next_tick == hrtimer_get_expires(&ts->sched_timer))
return;
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
@@ -935,7 +934,7 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
trace_tick_stop(1, TICK_DEP_MASK_NONE);
}
- ts->next_tick = tick;
+ ts->next_tick = expires;
/*
* If the expiration time == KTIME_MAX, then we simply stop
@@ -950,11 +949,11 @@ static void tick_nohz_stop_tick(struct tick_sched *ts, int cpu)
}
if (ts->nohz_mode == NOHZ_MODE_HIGHRES) {
- hrtimer_start(&ts->sched_timer, tick,
+ hrtimer_start(&ts->sched_timer, expires,
HRTIMER_MODE_ABS_PINNED_HARD);
} else {
- hrtimer_set_expires(&ts->sched_timer, tick);
- tick_program_event(tick, 1);
+ hrtimer_set_expires(&ts->sched_timer, expires);
+ tick_program_event(expires, 1);
}
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists