[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231220110041.23ed3c4e97a61d102c6b1e24@hugovil.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:00:41 -0500
From: Hugo Villeneuve <hugo@...ovil.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org, jringle@...dpoint.com,
kubakici@...pl, phil@...pberrypi.org, bo.svangard@...eddedart.se,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Hugo Villeneuve
<hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] serial: sc16is7xx: improve do/while loop in
sc16is7xx_irq()
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 17:42:42 +0200
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 12:18:48PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote:
> > From: Hugo Villeneuve <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>
> >
> > Simplify and improve readability by replacing while(1) loop with
> > do {} while, and by using the keep_polling variable as the exit
> > condition, making it more explicit.
>
> ...
>
> > + bool keep_polling;
>
> > +
>
> Stray blank line. Otherwise LGTM.
Yes, and I just realized I should also change:
do {
keep_polling = false;
int i;
...
to:
do {
int i;
keep_polling = false;
...
Hugo Villeneuve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists