[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <489ff972-272a-4038-b455-383fcbaa251d@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 16:14:04 +0000
From: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rui.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] thermal: gov_power_allocator: Support new update
callback of weights
Hi Rafael,
On 12/20/23 14:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 2:48 PM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
>>
>> When the thermal instance's weight is updated from the sysfs the governor
>> update_tz() callback is triggered. Implement proper reaction to this
>> event in the IPA, which would save CPU cycles spent in throttle().
>> This will speed-up the main throttle() IPA function and clean it up
>> a bit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c | 15 +++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
>> index 574aa5822112..a9f1549e6355 100644
>> --- a/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/thermal/gov_power_allocator.c
>> @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ static inline s64 div_frac(s64 x, s64 y)
>> * @trip_switch_on should be NULL.
>> * @trip_max: last passive trip point of the thermal zone. The
>> * temperature we are controlling for.
>> + * @total_weight: Sum of all thermal instances weights
>> * @num_actors: number of cooling devices supporting IPA callbacks
>> * @buffer_size: IPA internal buffer size
>> * @req_power: IPA buffer for requested power
>> @@ -76,6 +77,7 @@ struct power_allocator_params {
>> u32 sustainable_power;
>> const struct thermal_trip *trip_switch_on;
>> const struct thermal_trip *trip_max;
>> + int total_weight;
>> int num_actors;
>> int buffer_size;
>> u32 *req_power;
>> @@ -403,16 +405,11 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int control_temp)
>> u32 total_req_power = 0;
>> u32 *weighted_req_power;
>> u32 power_range, weight;
>> - int total_weight = 0;
>> int i = 0;
>>
>> if (!params->num_actors)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
>> - if (power_actor_is_valid(params, instance))
>> - total_weight += instance->weight;
>> -
>> /* Clean all buffers for new power estimations */
>> memset(params->req_power, 0, params->buffer_size);
>>
>> @@ -430,7 +427,7 @@ static int allocate_power(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int control_temp)
>> if (cdev->ops->get_requested_power(cdev, &req_power[i]))
>> continue;
>>
>> - if (!total_weight)
>> + if (!params->total_weight)
>> weight = 1 << FRAC_BITS;
>> else
>> weight = instance->weight;
>> @@ -666,6 +663,12 @@ static void power_allocator_update_tz(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
>>
>> allocate_actors_buffer(params, num_actors);
>> break;
>> + case THERMAL_INSTANCE_WEIGHT_UPDATE:
>> + params->total_weight = 0;
>> + list_for_each_entry(instance, &tz->thermal_instances, tz_node)
>> + if (power_actor_is_valid(params, instance))
>> + params->total_weight += instance->weight;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> break;
>> }
>> --
>
> This one looks good to me, but if you decide to follow my advice from
> the previous comments, it will need to be adjusted.
Yes, I will follow your recommendations, so this will be adjusted.
Thank you for the review. I will respond to your other comments in
patches as well.
Regards,
Lukasz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists