Message-ID: <20231220001856.3710363-15-jstultz@google.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:18:25 -0800
From: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>, Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>, 
	Qais Yousef <qyousef@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, 
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>, 
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, 
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>, 
	Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, 
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, 
	Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@....com>, Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>, 
	K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 14/23] sched: Handle blocked-waiter migration (and return migration)

Add logic to handle migrating a blocked waiter to a remote
cpu where the lock owner is runnable.

Additionally, as the blocked task may not be able to run
on the remote cpu, add logic to handle return migration once
the waiting task is given the mutex.

Because tasks may get migrated to where they cannot run,
this patch also modifies the scheduling classes to avoid
sched class migrations on mutex blocked tasks, leaving
proxy() to do the migrations and return migrations.

This was split out from the larger proxy patch, and
significantly reworked.

Credits for the original patch go to:
  Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
  Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
  Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
  Connor O'Brien <connoro@...gle.com>

Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>
Cc: Qais Yousef <qyousef@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Cc: Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>
Cc: Youssef Esmat <youssefesmat@...gle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Metin Kaya <Metin.Kaya@....com>
Cc: Xuewen Yan <xuewen.yan94@...il.com>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: kernel-team@...roid.com
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>
---
v6:
* Integrated sched_proxy_exec() check in proxy_return_migration()
* Minor cleanups to diff
* Unpin the rq before calling __balance_callbacks()
* Tweak proxy migrate to migrate deeper task in chain, to avoid
  tasks pingponging between rqs
v7:
* Fixup for unused function arguments
* Switch from that_rq -> target_rq, other minor tweaks, and typo
  fixes suggested by Metin Kaya
* Switch back to doing return migration in the ttwu path, which
  avoids nasty lock juggling and performance issues
* Fixes for UP builds
---
 kernel/sched/core.c     | 161 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/sched/deadline.c |   2 +-
 kernel/sched/fair.c     |   4 +-
 kernel/sched/rt.c       |   9 ++-
 4 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 42e25bbdfe6b..55dc2a3b7e46 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2981,8 +2981,15 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
 	struct set_affinity_pending my_pending = { }, *pending = NULL;
 	bool stop_pending, complete = false;
 
-	/* Can the task run on the task's current CPU? If so, we're done */
-	if (cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), &p->cpus_mask)) {
+	/*
+	 * Can the task run on the task's current CPU? If so, we're done
+	 *
+	 * We are also done if the task is selected, boosting a lock-
+	 * holding proxy, (and potentially has been migrated outside its
+	 * current or previous affinity mask)
+	 */
+	if (cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), &p->cpus_mask) ||
+	    (task_current_selected(rq, p) && !task_current(rq, p))) {
 		struct task_struct *push_task = NULL;
 
 		if ((flags & SCA_MIGRATE_ENABLE) &&
@@ -3778,6 +3785,39 @@ static inline void ttwu_do_wakeup(struct task_struct *p)
 	trace_sched_wakeup(p);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+static inline bool proxy_needs_return(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	if (!sched_proxy_exec())
+		return false;
+
+	if (task_current(rq, p))
+		return false;
+
+	if (p->blocked_on && p->blocked_on_state == BO_WAKING) {
+		raw_spin_lock(&p->blocked_lock);
+		if (!is_cpu_allowed(p, cpu_of(rq))) {
+			if (task_current_selected(rq, p)) {
+				put_prev_task(rq, p);
+				rq_set_selected(rq, rq->idle);
+			}
+			deactivate_task(rq, p, DEQUEUE_SLEEP | DEQUEUE_NOCLOCK);
+			resched_curr(rq);
+			raw_spin_unlock(&p->blocked_lock);
+			return true;
+		}
+		resched_curr(rq);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&p->blocked_lock);
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
+static inline bool proxy_needs_return(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
+{
+	return false;
+}
+#endif /*CONFIG_SMP */
+
 static void
 ttwu_do_activate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags,
 		 struct rq_flags *rf)
@@ -3870,9 +3910,12 @@ static int ttwu_runnable(struct task_struct *p, int wake_flags)
 			update_rq_clock(rq);
 			wakeup_preempt(rq, p, wake_flags);
 		}
+		if (proxy_needs_return(rq, p))
+			goto out;
 		ttwu_do_wakeup(p);
 		ret = 1;
 	}
+out:
 	__task_rq_unlock(rq, &rf);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -4231,6 +4274,7 @@ int try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
 	int cpu, success = 0;
 
 	if (p == current) {
+		WARN_ON(task_is_blocked(p));
 		/*
 		 * We're waking current, this means 'p->on_rq' and 'task_cpu(p)
 		 * == smp_processor_id()'. Together this means we can special
@@ -6632,6 +6676,91 @@ static bool proxy_deactivate(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next)
 	return true;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+/*
+ * If the blocked-on relationship crosses CPUs, migrate @p to the
+ * owner's CPU.
+ *
+ * This is because we must respect the CPU affinity of execution
+ * contexts (owner) but we can ignore affinity for scheduling
+ * contexts (@p). So we have to move scheduling contexts towards
+ * potential execution contexts.
+ *
+ * Note: The owner can disappear, but simply migrate to @target_cpu
+ * and leave that CPU to sort things out.
+ */
+static struct task_struct *
+proxy_migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
+		   struct task_struct *p, int target_cpu)
+{
+	struct rq *target_rq;
+	int wake_cpu;
+
+	lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq);
+	target_rq = cpu_rq(target_cpu);
+
+	/*
+	 * Since we're going to drop @rq, we have to put(@rq_selected) first,
+	 * otherwise we have a reference that no longer belongs to us. Use
+	 * @rq->idle to fill the void and make the next pick_next_task()
+	 * invocation happy.
+	 *
+	 * CPU0				CPU1
+	 *
+	 *				B mutex_lock(X)
+	 *
+	 * A mutex_lock(X) <- B
+	 * A __schedule()
+	 * A pick->A
+	 * A proxy->B
+	 * A migrate A to CPU1
+	 *				B mutex_unlock(X) -> A
+	 *				B __schedule()
+	 *				B pick->A
+	 *				B switch_to (A)
+	 *				A ... does stuff
+	 * A ... is still running here
+	 *
+	 *		* BOOM *
+	 */
+	put_prev_task(rq, rq_selected(rq));
+	rq_set_selected(rq, rq->idle);
+	set_next_task(rq, rq_selected(rq));
+	WARN_ON(p == rq->curr);
+
+	wake_cpu = p->wake_cpu;
+	deactivate_task(rq, p, 0);
+	set_task_cpu(p, target_cpu);
+	/*
+	 * Preserve p->wake_cpu, such that we can tell where it
+	 * used to run later.
+	 */
+	p->wake_cpu = wake_cpu;
+
+	rq_unpin_lock(rq, rf);
+	__balance_callbacks(rq);
+
+	raw_spin_rq_unlock(rq);
+	raw_spin_rq_lock(target_rq);
+
+	activate_task(target_rq, p, 0);
+	wakeup_preempt(target_rq, p, 0);
+
+	raw_spin_rq_unlock(target_rq);
+	raw_spin_rq_lock(rq);
+	rq_repin_lock(rq, rf);
+
+	return NULL; /* Retry task selection on _this_ CPU. */
+}
+#else /* !CONFIG_SMP */
+static struct task_struct *
+proxy_migrate_task(struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf,
+		   struct task_struct *p, int target_cpu)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+
 /*
  * Find who @next (currently blocked on a mutex) can proxy for.
  *
@@ -6654,8 +6783,11 @@ find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, struct rq_flags *rf)
 	struct task_struct *owner = NULL;
 	struct task_struct *ret = NULL;
 	struct task_struct *p;
+	int cur_cpu, target_cpu;
 	struct mutex *mutex;
-	int this_cpu = cpu_of(rq);
+	bool curr_in_chain = false;
+
+	cur_cpu = cpu_of(rq);
 
 	/*
 	 * Follow blocked_on chain.
@@ -6686,17 +6818,27 @@ find_proxy_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, struct rq_flags *rf)
 			goto out;
 		}
 
+		if (task_current(rq, p))
+			curr_in_chain = true;
+
 		owner = __mutex_owner(mutex);
 		if (!owner) {
 			ret = p;
 			goto out;
 		}
 
-		if (task_cpu(owner) != this_cpu) {
-			/* XXX Don't handle migrations yet */
-			if (!proxy_deactivate(rq, next))
-				ret = next;
-			goto out;
+		if (task_cpu(owner) != cur_cpu) {
+			target_cpu = task_cpu(owner);
+			/*
+			 * @owner can disappear, simply migrate to @target_cpu and leave that CPU
+			 * to sort things out.
+			 */
+			raw_spin_unlock(&p->blocked_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock(&mutex->wait_lock);
+			if (curr_in_chain)
+				return proxy_resched_idle(rq, next);
+
+			return proxy_migrate_task(rq, rf, p, target_cpu);
 		}
 
 		if (task_on_rq_migrating(owner)) {
@@ -6999,6 +7141,9 @@ static inline void sched_submit_work(struct task_struct *tsk)
 	 */
 	SCHED_WARN_ON(current->__state & TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT);
 
+	if (task_is_blocked(tsk))
+		return;
+
 	/*
 	 * If we are going to sleep and we have plugged IO queued,
 	 * make sure to submit it to avoid deadlocks.
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 9cf20f4ac5f9..4f998549ea74 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1705,7 +1705,7 @@ static void enqueue_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 
 	enqueue_dl_entity(&p->dl, flags);
 
-	if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)
+	if (!task_current(rq, p) && p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1 && !task_is_blocked(p))
 		enqueue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
 }
 
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 954b41e5b7df..8e3f118f6d6e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8372,7 +8372,9 @@ pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf
 		goto idle;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-	if (!prev || prev->sched_class != &fair_sched_class)
+	if (!prev ||
+	    prev->sched_class != &fair_sched_class ||
+	    rq->curr != rq_selected(rq))
 		goto simple;
 
 	/*
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
index 81cd22eaa6dc..a7b51a021111 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
@@ -1503,6 +1503,9 @@ enqueue_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
 	if (p->nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
 		return;
 
+	if (task_is_blocked(p))
+		return;
+
 	enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
 }
 
@@ -1790,10 +1793,12 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 
 	update_rt_rq_load_avg(rq_clock_pelt(rq), rq, 1);
 
-	/* Avoid marking selected as pushable */
-	if (task_current_selected(rq, p))
+	/* Avoid marking current or selected as pushable */
+	if (task_current(rq, p) || task_current_selected(rq, p))
 		return;
 
+	if (task_is_blocked(p))
+		return;
 	/*
 	 * The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing
 	 * if it is still active
-- 
2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists