[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e80a06aa-bb44-4993-8e67-dbc910a409ab@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 08:22:38 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>, "wsa@...nel.org" <wsa@...nel.org>,
Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: add bus-reset-gpios property
On 20/12/2023 00:25, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> I personally would like to see it accepted but it seems there are
>>> objections to this approach. I've yet to come up with anything better to
>>> offer as an alternative.
>>
>> I see. Thanks for the heads up!
>
> I'm also inclined to have this merged. A real fix might take
> time.
NAK
If you intend to merge it, then please carry:
Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
The patchset is wrong and made of wrong reasons. It claimed GPIO cannot
be shared, which is simply not true.
>
> Myself I have developed a prototype for what has been discussed
> with Krzysztof, but I don't know how much time it will take to
> get things done.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists