[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ5HzOxtbexQNE-A-bKhiUW1nHjvJQA_CCnmVXf+R6dbg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 12:55:50 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
andy@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] gpiolib: cdev: replace locking wrappers for
gpio_device with guards
(+PeterZ)
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 2:52 AM Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com> wrote:
> Replace the wrapping functions that inhibit removal of the gpio_device
> with equivalent guard macros.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>
(...)
> +DEFINE_CLASS(_read_sem_guard,
> + struct rw_semaphore *,
> + up_read(_T),
> + ({
> + down_read(sem);
> + sem;
> + }),
> + struct rw_semaphore *sem);
Isn't this so generic that it should be in <linux/cleanup.h>?
Otherwise all the patches look good to me.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists