[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zfy5t1qt.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 13:58:02 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@...il.com>
Cc: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com>,
ajones@...tanamicro.com,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@...tanamicro.com>,
Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@...ive.com>,
wchen <waylingii@...il.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Minda Chen <minda.chen@...rfivetech.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@...gle.com>,
Maciej Wieczor-Retman <maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@...gle.com>,
Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/11] KVM: selftests: Enable tunning of err_margin_us in arch timer test
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 13:51:24 +0000,
Haibo Xu <xiaobo55x@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 5:00 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2023-12-20 06:50, Haibo Xu wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 2:22 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 09:31:20 +0000,
> > >> Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@...el.com> wrote:
> > >> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h
> > >> > index 968257b893a7..b1d405e7157d 100644
> > >> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h
> > >> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/timer_test.h
> > >> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct test_args {
> > >> > int nr_iter;
> > >> > int timer_period_ms;
> > >> > int migration_freq_ms;
> > >> > + int timer_err_margin_us;
> > >>
> > >> ... except that you are storing it as a signed value. Some consistency
> > >> wouldn't hurt, really, and would avoid issues when passing large
> > >> values.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Yes, it's more proper to use an unsigned int for the non-negative error
> > > margin.
> > > Storing as signed here is just to keep the type consistent with that
> > > of timer_period_ms
> > > since there will be '+' operation in other places.
> > >
> > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/arch_timer.c
> > > /* Setup a timeout for the interrupt to arrive */
> > > udelay(msecs_to_usecs(test_args.timer_period_ms) +
> > > test_args.timer_err_margin_us);
> >
> > But that's exactly why using a signed quantity is wrong.
> > What does it mean to have a huge *negative* margin?
> >
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> I agree that negative values are meaningless for the margin.
> If I understand correctly, the negative margin should be filtered by
> assertion in atoi_non_negative().
No. Please.
atoi_non_negative() returns a uint32_t, which is what it should do.
The bug is squarely in the use of an 'int' to store such value, and it
is the *storage* that turns a positive value into a negative one.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists