[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231221171000.45310167@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 17:10:00 +0100
From: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet
<corbet@....net>, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Russ Weight
<russ.weight@...ux.dev>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Dent Project
<dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 8/8] net: pse-pd: Add PD692x0 PSE controller
driver
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 15:43:21 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 04:36:10PM +0100, Köry Maincent wrote:
> > Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > > OK... I mean, if they're not using the regulator framework I'm not sure
> > > it has much impact - there are plenty of internal regulators in devices
> > > already so it wouldn't be *too* unusual other than the fact that AFAICT
> > > this is somewhat split between devices within the subsystem? Neither of
> > > the messages was super clear.
>
> > PSE Power Interface (which is kind of the RJ45 in PSE world) have similar
> > functionalities as regulators. We wondered if registering a regulator for
> > each PSE PI (RJ45 ports) is a good idea. The point is that the PSE
> > controller driver will be its own regulator consumer.
> > I can't find any example in Linux with such a case of a driver being a
> > provider and a consumer of its own regulator. This idea of a regulator
> > biting its own tail seems weird to me. Maybe it is better to implement the
> > PSE functionalities even if they are like the regulator functionalities.
>
> Is it at all plausible that a system (perhaps an embedded one) might use
> something other than PSE?
Do you mean to supply power to a RJ45 port?
This can be done with a simple regulator. In that case we use the pse_regulator
driver which is a regulator consumer.
I don't know about other cases. Oleksij do you?
Regards,
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists