lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjJtcyi=oRf7Rtf2RueWq_336KEsSf9b-BKPxRcHHQx+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 10:01:32 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Anastasia Belova <abelova@...ralinux.ru>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>, 
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: Fix overwriting of result of DNS query

On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 07:09, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Could you apply this fix, please?

Ok, so this is just *annoying*.

Why did you send me this as a patch, and then *twenty minutes* later
you send me an AFS pull request that does *not* include this patch?

WTF?

I've applied this, but I'm really annoyed, because it really feels
like you went out of your way to just generate unnecessary noise and
pointless workflow churn.

It's not even like the pull request contained anything different. The
patch _and_ the pull request were both not just about AFS, but about
DNS issues in AFS.

Get your act together.

                    Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ