lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231221-ufs-reset-ensure-effect-before-delay-v2-1-75af2a9bae51@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:25:18 -0600
From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
To: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, 
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, 
 Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, 
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>, 
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, 
 Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>, Dov Levenglick <dovl@...eaurora.org>, 
 Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@...eaurora.org>, 
 Gilad Broner <gbroner@...eaurora.org>, 
 Venkat Gopalakrishnan <venkatg@...eaurora.org>, 
 Janek Kotas <jank@...ence.com>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, 
 Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, 
 Anjana Hari <quic_ahari@...cinc.com>, Dolev Raviv <draviv@...eaurora.org>, 
 Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>, 
 Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v2 01/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Perform read back after
 writing reset bit

Currently, the reset bit for the UFS provided reset controller (used by
its phy) is written to, and then a mb() happens to try and ensure that
hit the device. Immediately afterwards a usleep_range() occurs.

mb() ensure that the write completes, but completion doesn't mean that
it isn't stored in a buffer somewhere. The recommendation for
ensuring this bit has taken effect on the device is to perform a read
back to force it to make it all the way to the device. This is
documented in device-io.rst and a talk by Will Deacon on this can
be seen over here:

    https://youtu.be/i6DayghhA8Q?si=MiyxB5cKJXSaoc01&t=1678

Let's do that to ensure the bit hits the device. By doing so and
guaranteeing the ordering against the immediately following
usleep_range(), the mb() can safely be removed.

Fixes: 81c0fc51b7a7 ("ufs-qcom: add support for Qualcomm Technologies Inc platforms")
Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h
index 9dd9a391ebb7..b9de170983c9 100644
--- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h
+++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.h
@@ -151,10 +151,10 @@ static inline void ufs_qcom_assert_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	ufshcd_rmwl(hba, UFS_PHY_SOFT_RESET, UFS_PHY_SOFT_RESET, REG_UFS_CFG1);
 
 	/*
-	 * Make sure assertion of ufs phy reset is written to
-	 * register before returning
+	 * Dummy read to ensure the write takes effect before doing any sort
+	 * of delay
 	 */
-	mb();
+	ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_CFG1);
 }
 
 static inline void ufs_qcom_deassert_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
@@ -162,10 +162,10 @@ static inline void ufs_qcom_deassert_reset(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 	ufshcd_rmwl(hba, UFS_PHY_SOFT_RESET, 0, REG_UFS_CFG1);
 
 	/*
-	 * Make sure de-assertion of ufs phy reset is written to
-	 * register before returning
+	 * Dummy read to ensure the write takes effect before doing any sort
+	 * of delay
 	 */
-	mb();
+	ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UFS_CFG1);
 }
 
 /* Host controller hardware version: major.minor.step */

-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ