linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC v3 09/11] scsi: ufs: core: Perform read back after disabling UIC_COMMAND

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <edd975a7-d87a-4876-8e3e-9c038b2be089@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 11:29:25 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
 Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
 "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Janek Kotas <jank@...ence.com>,
 Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
 Can Guo <quic_cang@...cinc.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 09/11] scsi: ufs: core: Perform read back after
 disabling UIC_COMMAND_COMPL

On 12/21/23 11:09, Andrew Halaney wrote:
> Currently, the UIC_COMMAND_COMPL interrupt is disabled and a wmb() is
> used to complete the register write before any following writes.
> 
> wmb() ensures the writes complete in that order, but completion doesn't
> mean that it isn't stored in a buffer somewhere. The recommendation for
> ensuring this bit has taken effect on the device is to perform a read
> back to force it to make it all the way to the device. This is
> documented in device-io.rst and a talk by Will Deacon on this can
> be seen over here:
> 
>      https://youtu.be/i6DayghhA8Q?si=MiyxB5cKJXSaoc01&t=1678
> 
> Let's do that to ensure the bit hits the device. Because the wmb()'s
> purpose wasn't to add extra ordering (on top of the ordering guaranteed
> by writel()/readl()), it can safely be removed.
> 
> Fixes: d75f7fe495cf ("scsi: ufs: reduce the interrupts for power mode change requests")
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@...hat.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> index bb603769b029..75a03ee9a1ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd.c
> @@ -4240,7 +4240,7 @@ static int ufshcd_uic_pwr_ctrl(struct ufs_hba *hba, struct uic_command *cmd)
>   		 * Make sure UIC command completion interrupt is disabled before
>   		 * issuing UIC command.
>   		 */
> -		wmb();
> +		ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_INTERRUPT_ENABLE);
>   		reenable_intr = true;
>   	}
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>