linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] debugfs: initialize cancellations earlier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023122118-stopper-sizably-cc59@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 20:43:45 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: initialize cancellations earlier

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:55:13PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2023-12-21 at 18:17 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 
> > But this doesn't apply against Linus's tree, 
> 
> Hmm. It does for me?
> 
> $ git checkout linux/master
> ...
> $ curl -s https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231221150444.1e47a0377f80.If7e8ba721ba2956f12c6e8405e7d61e154aa7ae7@changeid/raw | git am -
> Applying: debugfs: initialize cancellations earlier
> $ 
> 
> > or my driver-core-next branch now,
> 
> Right, it doesn't apply there, that was branched out from v6.7-rc3.

Ah, yes.

> > where should it go?
> 
> I think/hope to 6.7 still, since it fixes something that only got there.
> 
> Looks like you routed that other debugfs patch (the lockdep revert I was
> talking about) through char-misc?

I did, sorry for the confusion, too many branches/trees...

I'll queue this up in the morning, thanks.

greg k-h