linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for the scheduler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0iU+nx_Tk_K74=dfeOuA7Lyvbq51UW=U1L4mZVEKy-+ZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 20:57:08 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, sudeep.holla@....com, 
	rafael@...nel.org, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, agross@...nel.org, 
	andersson@...nel.org, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, mingo@...hat.com, 
	peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, 
	rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, 
	vschneid@...hat.com, lukasz.luba@....com, rui.zhang@...el.com, 
	mhiramat@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, amit.kachhap@...il.com, 
	linux@...linux.org.uk, corbet@....net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] cpufreq: Add a cpufreq pressure feedback for the scheduler

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 4:24 PM Vincent Guittot
<vincent.guittot@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Provide to the scheduler a feedback about the temporary max available
> capacity. Unlike arch_update_thermal_pressure, this doesn't need to be
> filtered as the pressure will happen for dozens ms or more.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/cpufreq.h   | 10 ++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index 44db4f59c4cc..15bd41f9bb5e 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -2563,6 +2563,38 @@ int cpufreq_get_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get_policy);
>
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpufreq_pressure);
> +
> +/**
> + * cpufreq_update_pressure() - Update cpufreq pressure for CPUs
> + * @policy: cpufreq policy of the CPUs.
> + *
> + * Update the value of cpufreq pressure for all @cpus in the policy.
> + */
> +static void cpufreq_update_pressure(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> +{
> +       unsigned long max_capacity, capped_freq, pressure;
> +       u32 max_freq;
> +       int cpu;
> +
> +       cpu = cpumask_first(policy->related_cpus);
> +       pressure = max_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);

I would prefer two separate statements instead of the above.

Other than this

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>

> +       capped_freq = policy->max;
> +       max_freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(cpu);
> +
> +       /*
> +        * Handle properly the boost frequencies, which should simply clean
> +        * the thermal pressure value.
> +        */
> +       if (max_freq <= capped_freq)
> +               pressure -= max_capacity;
> +       else
> +               pressure -= mult_frac(max_capacity, capped_freq, max_freq);
> +
> +       for_each_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)
> +               WRITE_ONCE(per_cpu(cpufreq_pressure, cpu), pressure);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * cpufreq_set_policy - Modify cpufreq policy parameters.
>   * @policy: Policy object to modify.
> @@ -2618,6 +2650,8 @@ static int cpufreq_set_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>         policy->max = __resolve_freq(policy, policy->max, CPUFREQ_RELATION_H);
>         trace_cpu_frequency_limits(policy);
>
> +       cpufreq_update_pressure(policy);
> +
>         policy->cached_target_freq = UINT_MAX;
>
>         pr_debug("new min and max freqs are %u - %u kHz\n",
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index afda5f24d3dd..b1d97edd3253 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -241,6 +241,12 @@ struct kobject *get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
>  void cpufreq_enable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
>  void cpufreq_disable_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy);
>  bool has_target_index(void);
> +
> +DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, cpufreq_pressure);
> +static inline unsigned long cpufreq_get_pressure(int cpu)
> +{
> +       return per_cpu(cpufreq_pressure, cpu);
> +}
>  #else
>  static inline unsigned int cpufreq_get(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> @@ -263,6 +269,10 @@ static inline bool cpufreq_supports_freq_invariance(void)
>         return false;
>  }
>  static inline void disable_cpufreq(void) { }
> +static inline unsigned long cpufreq_get_pressure(int cpu)
> +{
> +       return 0;
> +}
>  #endif
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_STAT
> --
> 2.34.1
>