[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e5e9603-456b-4956-be03-b866feeeafb4@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 11:28:19 +0800
From: Jinlong Mao <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
"Mike Leach" <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>, Leo
Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring
<robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tingwei Zhang <quic_tingweiz@...cinc.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <quic_yuanfang@...cinc.com>,
Tao Zhang
<quic_taozha@...cinc.com>, <coresight@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Update the pattern of
ete node name
On 12/20/2023 11:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/12/2023 15:05, Mao Jinlong wrote:
>> Update the suffix for ete node name to be with "-".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mao Jinlong <quic_jinlmao@...cinc.com>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml | 6 +++---
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml
>> index f725e6940993..cbf583d34029 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arm,embedded-trace-extension.yaml
>> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ description: |
>>
>> properties:
>> $nodename:
>> - pattern: "^ete([0-9a-f]+)$"
>> + pattern: "^ete-([0-9a-f]+)$"
>
> My concerns are not resolved. Why is it here in the first place?
Hi Krzysztof,
ETE is acronym of embedded trace extension. The number of the name is
the same as the number of the CPU it belongs to.
Hi Suzuki,
Please help to comment on this.
Thanks
Jinlong Mao
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists