linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] docs: rust: Clarify that 'rustup override' applies to build directory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 22:40:02 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, 
	Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...sung.com>, 
	Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, 
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] docs: rust: Clarify that 'rustup override' applies to
 build directory

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 8:44 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Rustup override is required to be set for the build directory and not
> necessarily the kernel source tree (unless the build directory is its
> subdir).
>
> Clarify the same in quick-start guide.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

Since we are not going to use v3 given we will not have the
`rustupoverride` Make target, I have applied this one. It is also the
one that got more `Reviewed-by`s, I think Andreas preferred too and
Masahiro was kind enough to be OK applying this one instead of his
(which would need to be rebased and submitted to the list), so I went
with that one. Tiago's concern is still there though (i.e. the script
is relative to the source tree), but we can improve things further
later (perhaps if we add a script for this sort of thing).

Applied to `rust-next` (reworded and fixed quotes for `--path` and
`set`) -- thanks everyone!

Cheers,
Miguel