[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231221140300.4fcfd4945eeb3b6c145a969c@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 14:03:00 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, Baoquan He
<bhe@...hat.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar
<mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Simon
Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kexec: fix incorrect end address passed to
kernel_ident_mapping_init()
On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 18:17:02 +0800 Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com> wrote:
> kernel_ident_mapping_init() takes an exclusive memory range [pstart, pend)
> where pend is not included in the range, while res represents an inclusive
> memory range [start, end] where end is considered part of the range.
>
> Therefore, passing res->end directly to kernel_ident_mapping_init() is
> incorrect, the correct end address should be `res->end + 1`.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int mem_region_callback(struct resource *res, void *arg)
> struct init_pgtable_data *data = arg;
>
> return kernel_ident_mapping_init(data->info, data->level4p,
> - res->start, res->end);
> + res->start, res->end + 1);
> }
Thanks. When fixing a bug, please always full describe the
userspace-visible effects of that bug.
In this case I'm assuming "none", due to kernel_ident_mapping_init()'s
upward rounding of the address?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists