[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65d0c378-2126-4746-bb68-99ca97b6e069@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 15:34:52 -0800
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] nvdimm/dimm_devs: fix kernel-doc for function params
Hi Ira,
On 12/21/23 14:34, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Ira Weiny wrote:
>> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>>> diff -- a/drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c b/drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c
>>> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/dimm_devs.c
>>> @@ -53,7 +53,10 @@ static int validate_dimm(struct nvdimm_d
>>>
>>> /**
>>> * nvdimm_init_nsarea - determine the geometry of a dimm's namespace area
>>> - * @nvdimm: dimm to initialize
>>> + * @ndd: dimm to initialize
>>> + *
>>> + * Returns: %0 if the area is already valid, -errno on error,
>>
>> This is good...
>>
>>> ...otherwise an
>>> + * ND_CMD_* status code.
>>
>> I don't see where any of the ->ndctl() calls return an ND_CMD_* status
>> code. What am I missing?
Probably nothing.
Yes, please drop that/fix that when you merge it.
Thanks.
> If you agree that this should be dropped I can clean it up as I'm trying
> to prep the nvdimm tree now and was hoping to take this series.
>
> Ira
>
>>
>> The rest looks good,
>> Ira
--
#Randy
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
https://subspace.kernel.org/etiquette.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists