[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFP8O3+5fKcGS8xEY5=DHqsN0YdybEY178nM+cXRY1bbQXV4WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 20:53:38 -0800
From: Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>
To: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: remove VM_EXEC requirement for THP eligibility
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:42 PM Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 9:41 PM Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Commit e6be37b2e7bd ("mm/huge_memory.c: add missing read-only THP
> > checking in transparent_hugepage_enabled()") introduced the VM_EXEC
> > requirement, which is not strictly needed.
> >
> > lld's default --rosegment option and GNU ld's -z separate-code option
> > (default on Linux/x86 since binutils 2.31) create a read-only PT_LOAD
> > segment without the PF_X flag, which should be eligible for THP.
> >
> > Certain architectures support medium and large code models, where
> > .lrodata may be placed in a separate read-only PT_LOAD segment, which
> > should be eligible for THP as well.
>
> Yeah, it doesn't have to be VM_EXEC. The original implementation was
> restricted to VM_EXEC to minimize the blast radius and the targe use
> case is for large text segments. Out of curiosity, did you see any
> noticeable improvement with this change?
Hi Yang,
Thanks for the comment. Frankly, I am not familiar with huge pages...
I noticed this VM_EXEC condition when I was writing this
hugepage-related section in
https://maskray.me/blog/2023-12-17-exploring-the-section-layout-in-linker-output#transparent-huge-pages-for-mapped-files
(Thanks to Alexander Monakov's comment about
CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS in
https://mazzo.li/posts/check-huge-page.html).
As dTLB for read-only data is also an important optimization of
file-backed THP, it seems straightforward that we should drop the
VM_EXEC condition :)
On my Arch linux machine, the r--p page gets split if I invoke
madvise(__ehdr_start, HPAGE_SIZE, MADV_HUGEPAGE) I haven't figured out
why it behaves so in the presence of the VM_EXEC check.
% g++ test.cc -o ~/tmp/test -O2 -fuse-ld=lld
-Wl,-z,max-page-size=2097152 && sudo ~/tmp/test
__ehdr_start: 0x55f3b1c00000
55f3b1c00000-55f3b1e00000 r--p 00000000 103:03 555277119
/home/ray/tmp/test
55f3b1e00000-55f3b1e01000 r--p 00200000 103:03 555277119
/home/ray/tmp/test
55f3b2000000-55f3b2002000 r-xp 00200000 103:03 555277119
/home/ray/tmp/test
55f3b2201000-55f3b2202000 r--p 00201000 103:03 555277119
/home/ray/tmp/test
55f3b2401000-55f3b2402000 rw-p 00201000 103:03 555277119
/home/ray/tmp/test
55f3b3a9a000-55f3b3abb000 rw-p 00000000 00:00 0 [heap]
It'd be greatly appreciated if someone familiar with
CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS could provide some notes on how to use
this feature:)
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/huge_mm.h | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > index fa0350b0812a..4c9e67e9000f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
> > @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ static inline bool file_thp_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > inode = vma->vm_file->f_inode;
> >
> > return (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS)) &&
> > - (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC) &&
> > !inode_is_open_for_write(inode) && S_ISREG(inode->i_mode);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
> >
--
宋方睿
Powered by blists - more mailing lists