[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023122115-strewn-unsigned-b3e5@gregkh>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 09:08:54 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] uio: Fix use-after-free in uio_open
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 12:26:48PM +0800, Guanghui Feng wrote:
> core-1 core-2
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> uio_unregister_device uio_open
> idev = idr_find()
> device_unregister(&idev->dev)
> put_device(&idev->dev)
> uio_device_release
> get_device(&idev->dev)
> kfree(idev)
> uio_free_minor(minor)
> uio_release
> put_device(&idev->dev)
> kfree(idev)
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> In the core-1 uio_unregister_device(), the device_unregister will kfree idev
> when the idev->dev kobject ref is one. But after core-1 device_unregister,
> put_device and before doing kfree, the core-2 may get_device. Then:
> 1. After core-1 kfree idev, the core-2 will do use-after-free for idev.
> 2. When core-2 do uio_release and put_device, the idev will be double freed.
>
> To address this issue, we can get idev atomic & inc idev reference with minor_lock.
Nit, can you wrap your lines at 72 columns?
Anyway, nice fix, how did you find this?
> Signed-off-by: Guanghui Feng <guanghuifeng@...ux.alibaba.com>
What commit id does this fix?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists