lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231221082105.GA600162@ziqianlu-desk2>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 16:21:05 +0800
From: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
CC: Imran Khan <imran.f.khan@...cle.com>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<peterz@...radead.org>, <juri.lelli@...hat.com>, <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	<rostedt@...dmis.org>, <bsegall@...gle.com>, <mgorman@...e.de>,
	<bristot@...hat.com>, <vschneid@...hat.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: fair: reset task_group.load_avg when there
 are no running tasks.

Hi Vincent,

Thanks for the heads up.

On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 06:31:08PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Aaron,
> Could you run the tests that you run for testing "Ratelimit update to
> tg->load_avg" and check if this patch impacts your performance ?

I run hackbench/netperf/postgres_sysbench with nr_thread=nr_cpu on a 2
sockets/120cores/240cpus Intel server and didn't notice any performance
change after applying your diff so I think it's not a problem.

Regards,
Aaron

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ